16,418 research outputs found

    Rigidity in topology C^0 of the Poisson bracket for Tonelli Hamiltonians

    Full text link
    We prove the following rigidity result for the Tonelli Hamiltonians. Let T * M be the cotangent bundle of a closed manifold M endowed with its usual symplectic form. Let (F\_n) be a sequence of Tonelli Hamiltonians that C^0 converges on the compact subsets to a Tonelli Hamiltonian F. Let (G\_n) be a sequence of Hamiltonians that that C^0 converges on the compact subsets to a Hamiltonian G. We assume that the sequence of the Poisson brackets ({F\_n , G\_n }) C^0-converges on the compact subsets to a C^1 function H. Then H = {F, G}

    Lower and upper bounds for the Lyapunov exponents of twisting dynamics: a relationship between the exponents and the angle of the Oseledet's splitting

    Full text link
    We consider locally minimizing measures for the conservative twist maps of the dd-dimensional annulus or for the Tonelli Hamiltonian flows defined on a cotangent bundle T∗MT^*M. For weakly hyperbolic such measures (i.e. measures with no zero Lyapunov exponents), we prove that the mean distance/angle between the stable and the unstable Oseledet's bundles gives an upper bound of the sum of the positive Lyapunov exponents and a lower bound of the smallest positive Lyapunov exponent. Some more precise results are proved too

    Pseudographs and Lax-Oleinik semi-group: a geometric and dynamical interpretation

    Full text link
    Let H be a Tonelli Hamiltonian defined on the cotangent bundle of a compact and connected manifold and let u be a semi-concave function defined on M. If E (u) is the set of all the super-differentials of u and (\phi t) the Hamiltonian flow of H, we prove that for t > 0 small enough, \phi-t (E (u)) is an exact Lagrangian Lipschitz graph. This provides a geometric interpretation/explanation of a regularization tool that was introduced by P.~Bernard to prove the existence of C 1,1 subsolutions
    • …
    corecore